Christian? Like Trump?

Q: should Christians vote for Donald Trump?

Possibly yes – but watch out if you do! Whilst despite all his faults (he who is without sin cast the first stone right?) he is actually the only president in history to actually do what he says he’s going to do – does not speak out of both sides of his mouth – and actually doing all the things that American people need to return to living in a prosperous nation – like bringing business back – which have been sold for a song and a lot of back-handers by previous administrations – make no mistake – Christians are being set up by our adversary.

Christians are being set up – The Bible tells us so

What do I mean? If you haven’t noticed – the left and liberals – who are bent on doing as thou wilt – are making absolutely sure Trump and his policies are tied firmly to Christians in their coverage of him in the media – it’s being portrayed as all our fault he is in power – and everything thing he does is what Christians and more specifically – The Bible would advocate. So-called racism (who on this earth is pure racially? – answer – no one! It’s makes no sense to be racist, and Donald Trump is way bright enough to know this) – and everything else that’s ‘wrong’ with trump – or more specifically does not let them do as thou wilt will be deemed as our fault. For instance – protecting the unborn would be an example. This is being sown in the subconscious of ordinary folks everywhere and will be brought to the fore exactly – and only when the time is right.

It’s only a temporary head-wound

Sure it looks like truth and honesty and transparentness is getting a renaissance and the beast is certainly getting a head-wound – because as God says in the Bible – ‘my people’ cried out – to be released from the previous tyranny and genuinely started to clean up their lives – but it’s a window of opportunity to do God’s work and temporal – at some point, the left with rise and next time they do – Christians will not just be marginalised and mocked – they will really – I mean really be blamed for everything that’s wrong in the world. We can already – and have for many years been hearing echoes of this.

The plan was – and is still the same

The left think we don’t know the plan – to discredit Christians, and Jesus and The Bible under the guise of 101 other reasons like ‘supporting’ minority groups – but we know – and have known for 2000 years – its all purely political, and these people care-not about any marginalised group they pretend to care about – only themselves.

Cryptos will not free us from the banks – it’s a temporal reprieve

Governments (bankers) can’t control cryptos? Rubbish – if we think that, we have no idea what powers we are up against. Soon everyone will need a license to even access the web. The fact is – you cannot have a new world order where everything is ‘fair’ (or in other words everyone is under a socialism) and they can do as thou wilt – with the salt and light of the Bible still pervasive as it is in the West. It, and its adherents have to go – if not now – later – and Donald Trump and people like him that advocate Christian principles, will be used as the perfect excuse. This ignores the complexity of him being involved with Jarred and the other Kabbalah adherents – that’s another but intertwined subject.

Should Christians be involved in politics?

Jesus and politics

Founding Fathers and politics and Christianity

New Word Order

Does ‘News’ Analysis Achieve Anything?

Two tier legal system

Can you imagine if you or I was really smart person and commander in chief of security of our country, with decades of lawyerly background behinds us, and we put top secret emails on our home – yes home server, and then claimed they didn’t know what ‘c’ meant, then covered for our husband’s illicit affairs – and then had the audacity to run for president, and not at least get a slap on the wrist but be revered and adored for your actions just because you happen to simultaneously project an image of being a sweet grandmother who couldn’t possibly be in it for the money? It would never happen. In fact, I have a friend who’s elderly mother WAS placed behind bars for a few years for getting unintentionally dragged into a tiny amount of tax evasion. There is no excuse for it, but let’s get one thing straight; this is NOTHING – NOTHING in comparison to the back-handers we see politicians constantly getting away with, day in day out under the guise of ‘business’, ‘charity’ and a thousand other appearances of light.

One rule for us, another for them

Or can you imagine if you or I had done one tenth of what we see happening in politics generally, with them all lying and covering for one another in broad daylight. Would we still be free? Of course not. And then there’s all the talking heads or twits as I prefer to call them on Twitter – endlessly chattering about who is and isn’t guilty of x,y or z, as if they are going to have any real effect on the outcome, or the real powers behind the throne.

Twitter – the site that makes twits of us all

 When I first saw Twitter I thought it was a dreadful idea – people sharing what style of coffee they were having at breakfast in a few words – so I knew it would be a huge success with people these days having attention spans slightly longer than birds. But then I felt there was some light as I realised it could bypass the biased news monopolies and give us instant real news updates, but alas no… it just morphed into a hyper-gossip service and back-biting haven on steroids. And in any case, I always knew most news was exacerbating world problems, and not making us all more aware and therefore ‘socially responsible’ as they might claim. Sure it’s good we know that there are tyrants out there, but when all is said and done, I think endless bad news makes us all desensitised to it and there is no longer any shock or revolt. Probably what our adversary wants come to think of it. Can you imagine God instituting ‘news’ and gossip networks as they are? Never.

Taking wasting time to a whole new level

My little rant here is wast of time enough, but unbeknownst to the users of it, Twit-ster really is a total waste of time and energy and resources – there I said it. The irony is that Twitter literally makes twits of all its users, most of whom feel pressured to use it and would give it up in a heartbeat if they felt they had a choice (which of course they do, and just need a little more guts to kick this site and the habit of endless gossiping and false witnessing into touch once and for all).


So it’s futile in my humble opinion to hope that our systems of justice – though they are pretty good in the West comparatively – as they are based on biblical principles – will be upheld for politicians as they are for us or the opposition in the long term or even in most cases in this life. And as we all know, this kind of double standard, and calling good evil and evil good is foretold (I prefer the word ‘foretold’ than ‘predicted’ as the latter indicates that something may or may not happen) in the Bible.

Publicity is what those that commit violence want; shutting down ‘news’ stations would shut down much of it instantly

The question is though, could we live without our daily dose of gossip and bad news? I would argue that it’s the news channels themselves that are largely – or at least partly responsible for the continuance of violence around the world that they report on. Sure they can argue the; ‘it’s in the public’s interest to know what’s going on‘ card – but is it? – and do we really need to know 7 days a week 24/7? What does this endless stream of bad news and corruption ‘analysis’ do to our brains scientifically – I’d like to know? In the main, publicity is all the propagators of these crimes want, to instil fear into their enemies and rest of us globally, and get their message out and the changes they want made through fear.  It’s a fact; NOT publicising their actions would kill a lot of their agendas stone dead in their tracks.

There won’t be any news channels (at least as we know them:) in heaven

I realise this is never going to change, and news channels will not disappear, but I just wanted to put forward my point of view (as if anyone cares:) that as long as news channels showcase and analyse and spread the news of their actions, which incidentally has absolutely zero benefits to doing so (we asked to meditate on what is good and holy and pure) the mess will continue to get worse. This is why I would never want to be a red anchor – a deliverer of bad news. How can darkness ever dispel darkness? It can’t.

Novel Idea; How about The Good News Channel?

Imagine a channel who’s sole purpose was to seek out and find and report on and reward  doers of good works and in doing so propagate good works – yes I said that terrible phrase ‘good works’ not allowed in Christian circles in all of Christendom except the last few decades since we all forgot what the Bible actually says – to do them! It is the good news we should be proclaiming as the light displaced darkness and makes darkness more unpalatable and unacceptable. CCN, Fox and the rest leave us desensitised – just what the devil ordered.

Why ‘Globalism’ Vs ‘Nationalism’ is Irrelevant

A famous banker once said; “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws.”

Why is this related to the nationalism v globalism ‘debate’? It’s because at different levels in the human and especially political food chain, there are different, and even opposing levels of thought on this so-called issue.

On the ground level you have the masses worrying about football and baseball games, and issues like left, right, gay, straight, black white etc. Then on the political level you have career politicians – most of whom care nothing of race, gender or equality but are pretending to ‘fight’ these issues on our (the plebs) behalf and also over ‘nationalism’ versus ‘globalism’ as further entertainment and distraction for the masses (as if nationalism is some how bad when in fact, when it’s not being done just as en excuse to keep ‘foreigners’ out – which is wrong since we are all of mixed blood and foreigners to one degree or other) nationalism should simply be no more than pride in a counties good achievements, and it’s borders should be no more than a protection mechanism to keep out the few bad apples that have the power to ruin a nation, but should never be a supremacy / race or colour thing).

Then, while all the arguing and ‘debates’ (distractions) are going on at the lower levels pitting ‘race’ against ‘race’, black against white, man against woman, gay against straight, rich against poor, football against baseball, kneeling versus standing for the anthem, left against right, it’s all in the end irrelevant to the real powers that lie behind the career politicians.

Why? Because at the deepest or highest level depending on which angle you look at it, you have big business folks who care nothing about nations, states or even individuals (though they will pretend otherwise with grand philanthropic gestures and constant mantras about loving everyone and being inclusive when this is just being used a s vehicle to line their pockets further) who are the ones really in control. These are the people that pay politicians and fund campaigns to get the outcome they want for their business – and it nearly always works, though spectacularly failed just recently.

The so-called nationalism versus globalism ‘debate’ is just another tool in the hands of big business and bankers

As long as we are not looking at what they are doing, and endlessly debating amongst ourselves about anything but, these people are laughing; nationalism versus globalism or whateverism? – just let the people fight over it and all the while, we in the background are busy creating a borderless business world in which every transaction is digitally recorded, making every person, whether they like it or not, part of a single governing body – which we and our friends – the banks – will run. Let them have their pretend borders and nations they will be saying! We don’t care, as we have already created a borderless world in which everyone will be working for us.

You don’t need to erase borders to have a borderless world – we already have one coming into view

So now we already see our single, borderless ‘inclusive’ socialist world (where no one has a choice to opt out if they don’t like what they are seeing, with those in control of course exempt from the socialist part, having appointed themselves masters of the universe, experts at giving away other people’s money, and kindly mapping out for us – the un-enlightened one’s – destinies) and global government coming into view regardless of country names or drawn out state lines, with what were once real borders reduced to pseudo borders and pseudo ‘countries. It’s been the plan from the beginning, the reversal of God’s judgment on Babylon and men becoming God’s as mentioned in the Garden of Eden and written about and foretold in many other places in the Bible.

The Bible clearly says; we are all of one blood – and if we believe we were created in God’s image and all descended from Adman and Eve (it’s either that, or amoeba and monkeys – take your pick) and the Genome Project that corroborates the Bible’s explanation of us all descending from two people is anything to go by for all the science buffs – then we should believe the Bible, and realise that all these debates are no more than distractions from what’s going on under our noses.

Those with the money (or rather those that practice making it without doing any work by printing it and loaning it out at interest – a practice that until a few hundred years ago was forbidden everywhere) have for hundreds of years been planning the only world order in which they could possibly envisage having ‘peace’ without Jesus reigning in, and therefore keeping in check, the hearts of men, women and children – all be it a pseudo peace. One where they are in control of everything and everyone – and that would require being in control of one thing; every financial transaction – everywhere. Once this happens, and we’re almost there, ‘borders’ as we know them may exist physically, but will cease to have any meaning, and for all intents and purposes cease to exist.

How To Tell Which Politicians are Honest and Genuine and Which are Not

Ever wanted to know which politicians are telling the truth as they see it, or to the best of their knowledge at least, and which are plain liars, fake, falsify truth and are dishonest to themselves and others? It seems that most voters don’t care – and are more interested in the veneer and the ‘speak’ rather than the integrity of the person. This is how they sometimes get away with the unthinkable and often what the every day person would never get away with. In any case, why is the question in politics always reduced to the false idea of left or right, and not wrong or right?

Real and convicted or fake and phony?

But is this even remotely possible to tell which politicians are honest and which are fake careerists or somewhere in between? It is actually I believe. All we need to do – though it can be quite a long process to watch all the necessary videos, is to watch the amazing YouTube channel of a body language expert pick apart interviews on our loved and loathed politicians. You know – the eye movements, eye contact, twitches and sitting position etc.

This expert is careful to point out that body language analysis is not an exact science – but it is a great indicator and can be very accurate

As it happens, most of the conclusions this body language expert comes to – and I must point out that by her own admission they are her opinions on these politicians – match my gut instincts on all the folks she analyses. Does that mean I have what the Bible calls the gift of discernment?.. I’m not sure, but either way, her body language videos are a must watch for anyone that is serious about voting in politicians and members of congress and leaders that are honest, or at the very least believe in what they say, regardless of whether what they are saying is the best policy.

At least we can use this resource (for perhaps as long as they are unaware such channels exist!) to see who has at the least – conviction, and who is just an actor – or a mix of both, and to what extent. Anyway enough of this, here’s the channel. Bookmark it and anytime you want to know what a particular person is really like underneath their political veneer or not as the case may be.

Bombard’s Body Language Channel analyses politicians & celebrities >>

The ‘Right’ Should Not Resort to The ‘Left’s’ Tactics

Just a quick thought; I hate talking about the so-called left and right – that false idea that causes people on each ‘side’ to have to tow the party line even if they don’t think it’s right – the name-calling and labelling system that everyone like to use to advance their own cause – the system designed to pit small minded folks against each other instead of do what’s right, while the elite get away with everything and anything under our noses while we do so.

The truth is we should be only concerned about who’s right and who’s wrong – not who’s left and right – I mean what does that even mean? You can make left, right, centre, or far right or far left mean anything you want, whenever you want – one thing today, another thing tomorrow – depending on which bad group an accuser wants to smear your name with by lumping and associating you in with them even if you disagree with 99% of that group’s ideas.

But that aside; I’ve noticed a lot of conservatives resorting to the same low tactics of the so called liberal left – name-calling, endless debating (the bible warns us to avoid not least as it makes us look like fools), insults void of argument and the like, when people who love and want to preserve real freedom and everyone to prosper, should be using ONLY sound argument and ideas to advance their cause.